Where the information comes from
- Primary sources: data processing agreements, terms of use, privacy notices, sub-processor lists, trust centres, and the provider’s own help and pricing pages.
- Blogs, comparison portals and law firm articles are not used as evidence for new entries.
- Each statement applies to one plan and carries a link to the source together with its retrieval date.
What “not publicly documented” means
documented: with sourcenot publicly documented
If we could not verify a statement in any provider source (page not retrievable, only accessible after login or with JavaScript, contract only on request), it is shown visibly as such. This does not mean the matter is unproblematic. It means that we have not checked it. In addition, every entry has a list of open points.
Entries “under review”
Entries based solely on secondary sources (currently the legacy entries, as of 6–9 Sep 2026) are marked “under review”. They are only listed as documented once they have been checked against the provider’s primary sources. Depending on the configuration, they are hidden entirely.
How current the information is
Contract terms change, sometimes without notice. Every entry shows its review date and every source its retrieval date. We plan to re-check each tool quarterly. The situation may have changed between the review date and the time you read it.
No rating, no third-party influence
There are no scores, traffic lights or recommendations. The AI Act notes are marked “for review” and are not legal advice. Providers cannot buy the content or the order of an entry. The register uses no ad networks, no tracking and no provider logos.
Correction process for providers and readers
Do you think a statement is incorrect? Use the correction form to tell us:
- the entry and plan concerned,
- the statement you consider incorrect,
- the correct statement,
- the reference, ideally your DPA, your sub-processor list or your terms of use.
What happens next:
- We confirm receipt and check the statement against the primary source you named.
- If the correction is justified, we update the entry and the review date.
- If it is not, we tell you our reasons and the source we rely on.
- Where the facts are disputed, we mark the statement until the matter is resolved.
We handle reports in the order in which they arrive. We do not commit to a fixed deadline, because the review depends on whether the provider’s documents are publicly accessible.
Analysis and raw data
The classifications of all plans are summarised in the data report. It also sets out the counting rules and provides the raw data as a CSV file, one row per plan.
About this English version
The interface and page texts are translated. Free-text details taken from provider documents are shown in the original German where no translation exists yet, marked “Original text in German”. The register is maintained in German; if the versions differ, the German version applies.